Lemuria | Carol Chapman

Lemuria used to be in the Indian Ocean, not the Pacific

Maybe Hawaii is not associated with Lemuria at all. In reading an online article called A Short History of Lemuria, author Larry Williamson says that according to the mystic Madame Elena Petrovna Blavatsky, Lemuria was located in the Indian Ocean, not the Pacific.

Larry Williamson says that Mme Blavatsky:

She described the Lemurians as the third root race to inhabit the earth. They were egg-laying beings with a third eye that gave them psychic powers and allowed them to function without a brain. Originally bisexual, their downfall came about after they discovered sex.
A Short History of Lemuria

No scientific evidence for the existence of Lemuria

So, now, as a result of my discussion yesterday about Hawaii and Lemuria, I’m interested in Lemuria. According to a Wikipedia article on the subject, there once was scientific interest in a lost continent called Lemuria until the theory of plate tectonics gained favor. Presently, according to the Wikipedia article, “there is no scientific evidence to support” claims that Lemuria once existed and disappeared into the sea.

3

Ruins of Lemuria underwater in Hawaii

At lunch today I talked with a couple of friends about their experiences in Hawaii. This evening, I wondered if Hawaii had anything to do with Lemuria since Hawaii is in the middle of the Pacific Ocean and Lemuria was supposed to be in the Pacific Ocean. Well, you can imagine my delight when I saw this excerpt from Crystalinks:

One of Hawaii’s leading authorities on Lemurian research was Sgt. Williard Wannall from Army Intelligence in Oahu. He reported that ruins of a submerged Lemurian city was between Maui and Oahu. It was a Top Secret project in Naval Intelligence in 1972.
Lemuria: Lemurian Paradise

Does the possible Confucius forehead lump mean he was from Lemuria?

Yesterday, I showed that, at least in one portrait, Confucius appeared to have a lump, or anyway something, on his forehead. Today I wonder:

Does the lump, if it is a lump, signifies that Confucius was from Lemuria in a past life, and whether the lump characteristic had continued in his physical makeup through reincarnation millennia after the demise of Lemuria, is anyone’s guess.

What do you think? Do you know if Confucius had a lump on his forehead? If so, do you think he was a Lemurian? Or, is this simply too outrageous for you?

Did Confucius have a lump on his forehead?

Portrait of Confucius, by Tang Dynasty artist Wu Daozi (680-740)

In response to the telephone call I received yesterday, I decided to do some research today. As I wrote in my post yesterday, my friend had said that she had just read a book about Lemuria saying that Lemurians had a lump on their forehead and that Confucius had a lump on his forehead. She thought this could indicate that Confucius had been a Lemurian in a past life.
Therefore, I wondered: Did Confucius really have a lump on his forehead? So, today I did a Google search for portraits of Confucius. This is difficult since Confucius was born in 551 B.C. and, according to the Wikipedia article, Confucius:

No contemporary painting or sculpture of Confucius survives, and it was only during the Han Dynasty that he was portrayed visually.
Wikipedia: Confucius

However, as you can see in the Wikipedia image on the left, it appears that Confucius did have something on his forehead, or anyway, he does in this image. This was the only online image of Confucius I found in which he seemed to have something on his forehead, by the way. There may be a tradition that Confucius had a lump on this forehead so that this Tang Dynasty artist made this image to show that characteristic about a thousand years after the death of Confucius.

Lemurians had a lump on their foreheads

Here’s something strange and interesting! A girlfriend telephoned me last night to say that she had just read a book on Lemuria. According to the book, Lemurians had a lump or bump on their foreheads. My friend thought that intriguing since, evidently, Confucius had a lump on his forehead. Was Confuscious descended from Lemurians?

Pacific Ocean Devil’s Sea is a Bermuda Triangle counterpart

I continue to be interested in the Bermuda Triangle, a triangular area in the Atlantic Ocean from Miami to Puerto Rico to Bermuda, because America’s great psychic Edgar Cayce said that evidence of Atlantis could be found if a geological survey would be done at Bimini, a pair of islands in the Bermuda Triangle. Therefore, I wonder if the Bermuda Triangle phenomena could be the result of still-active technology from the buried Atlantis.

Interestingly, there is another part of the ocean, off the coast of Japan in the Pacific Ocean, called the “Devil’s Sea,” that also experiences unusual phenomenon. Could this be from the undersea lost continent of Lemuria?

Submerged ruins off the coast of Japan could be Mu

An online article at Mystic Travel, Cayce prediction Japan will sink into the Ocean and the Lost city of Mu, says that off shore ruins at Yoniguni, Japan, include pyramid 25 meters tall and that they could be ruins of the lost continent of Lemuria Mu:

In the past years there has been discovered the Yoniguni formations. Underneath the sea close to Japan has been found huge stone pyramid structure. The pyramid rises from a depth of 25 meters. Some scientists suspect is the lost city of Mu.

Before Pangaea, came Pannotia

According to the online Wikipedia article, Supercontinent Cycle, there is a regular rhythm between the drifting apart and coming together of continents.

One complete Supercontinent cycle is said to take 300 to 500 million years to occur.

Again, I wonder if, during this ongoing drift of continents, if the legendary lost city of Atlantis and the lost continent of Lemuria fragmented, bumped up against other land masses, and eventually disappeared.

Many Pangaeas

You have probably heard of Pangaea, the supercontinent that existed about 250 million years ago. It included all the present continents in one land mass.

Map of Pangaea, from an online Wikipedia article

But did you know that not only did Pangaea break up into land masses that drifted apart to form continents, but, according to an online Wikepedia article on “Pangaea:”

The breaking up and formation of supercontinents appear to be cyclical through Earth’s 4.6 billion year history.

It appears that earth’s land masses drift over the surface of the earth. I find it interesting to learn that at one time, earth’s land masses were almost all concentrated at the north and south poles with only a narrow strip of land connecting them through the equator. What a strange world that would have been!

Knowing this, it is not so far-fetched to believe that lost continents such as Atlantis and Lemuria once existed.

Archive